Which F&I Products Belong in a Dealer Reinsurance Program (And Which Don’t)
- Michael Aufmuth
- Jan 2
- 6 min read
Updated: Jan 11

One of the most common issues I see when reviewing dealer reinsurance programs has nothing to do with volume, compliance, or even structure. It comes down to product selection.
Many dealers assume that if a product can be reinsured, it should be reinsured. In reality, that mindset is one of the fastest ways to undermine long-term reinsurance performance. Reinsurance is not about maximizing participation. It is about building a stable, predictable underwriting portfolio that performs over time.
This article explains how I think about F&I product selection when structuring or reviewing a dealer reinsurance program. Not from a theory standpoint, but from real-world experience working with dealers across automotive, powersports, RV, and related markets.
Why Product Selection Matters More Than Volume in Dealer Reinsurance
Volume amplifies whatever structure is in place. If the structure is sound and the product mix is disciplined, volume accelerates success. If the product mix is flawed, volume magnifies the problem.
Reinsurance works best when claims behavior is predictable, pricing is adequate, and loss trends can be measured over time. When volatile products are added indiscriminately, reserves become stressed, distributions slow, and confidence in the program erodes.
In many cases, dealers are disappointed with reinsurance not because the concept failed, but because the wrong products were included.
Characteristics of F&I Products That Perform Well in Reinsurance
Before discussing specific products, it is important to understand the characteristics that typically drive positive reinsurance outcomes.
Predictable Claims Behavior
Products that perform well in reinsurance tend to have claims that are:
Consistent over time
Supported by credible historical data
Less sensitive to external economic shifts
Predictability allows reserves to be set accurately and adjusted responsibly as data matures.
Long-Term Loss Visibility
Reinsurance is a long-term strategy. Products with claims that emerge gradually and can be modeled over time provide greater confidence in underwriting results.
Short-tail, high-severity products often introduce volatility that complicates reserve planning.
Pricing Discipline
Even the best product can perform poorly if pricing is inconsistent. Products with disciplined pricing, clear coverage definitions, and strong underwriting standards are better suited for reinsurance participation.
Administrative Consistency
Claims handling matters. Products administered consistently, with clear adjudication standards and strong customer support, tend to produce more reliable results in reinsurance portfolios.
F&I Products Commonly Well-Suited for Dealer Reinsurance Programs
While every dealership and market is different, certain product categories consistently perform well when structured correctly.
Vehicle Service Contracts
Vehicle service contracts are often the backbone of a dealer reinsurance program. When properly priced and administered, they offer:
Predictable claims patterns
Strong historical data
Long-term performance visibility
Service contracts allow dealers to participate meaningfully in underwriting profit while maintaining alignment between customer value and dealership profitability.
Limited Warranties
Limited warranties often perform well due to their defined coverage and narrower exposure. Claims tend to be more controlled, and loss behavior is easier to model.
When combined with disciplined underwriting and consistent training, limited warranties can add stability to a reinsurance portfolio.
Certain Appearance and Protection Products
Some appearance and protection products can be appropriate for reinsurance, particularly when:
Coverage terms are clearly defined
Claim frequency is moderate
Severity is limited
Not all protection products are created equal, and each should be evaluated individually. The key is understanding claims behavior before inclusion.
Products That Require Caution or Should Be Excluded From Reinsurance
Just because a product is popular or generates strong upfront revenue does not mean it belongs in reinsurance.
Highly Volatile Products
Products with unpredictable claims frequency or severity introduce unnecessary risk. These products often:
Stress reserves
Delay distributions
Create inconsistent underwriting results
Volatility undermines the stability that reinsurance is designed to provide.
Products With Regulatory or Claims Uncertainty
Products subject to frequent regulatory change or inconsistent claims interpretation can create long-term complications. Uncertainty increases administrative complexity and makes accurate forecasting difficult.
Why GAP Often Creates Challenges in Reinsurance
GAP protection is one of the most misunderstood products in reinsurance discussions. While GAP can be a valuable consumer product, it is often poorly suited for reinsurance due to:
Loss severity tied to external factors
Economic sensitivity
Volatility in claims experience
In many cases, GAP introduces more risk than reward within a reinsurance structure. For this reason, I generally advise dealers to approach GAP cautiously or exclude it entirely from reinsurance portfolios.
How Product Mix Affects Reserves and Distributions
Product mix directly impacts how reserves are established and how quickly profit becomes accessible.
Blended Portfolios vs Product-Level Performance
When strong and weak products are blended together, underperforming products can suppress the performance of the entire portfolio. Product-level visibility allows dealers to make informed adjustments rather than guessing.
Claims Lag Differences
Different products experience claims at different points in their lifecycle. Mixing products with dramatically different claims lag profiles complicates reserve planning and delays profit recognition.
Long-Term Reserve Pressure
Volatile products increase reserve requirements, even when they represent a smaller portion of volume. Over time, this pressure limits distributions and reduces perceived program success.
How I Build a Disciplined Dealer Reinsurance Portfolio
When structuring or refining a dealer reinsurance program, I favor a disciplined, intentional approach.
Start Narrow
It is better to reinsure a small number of well-performing products than to reinsure everything. Starting narrow allows dealers to build confidence and understand performance drivers.
Measure and Adjust
Performance should be reviewed regularly. Products that consistently perform well can be expanded. Products that underperform should be addressed or removed.
Expand With Purpose
As volume grows and data matures, portfolios can evolve. Expansion should be driven by performance data, not pressure or convenience.
This approach prioritizes sustainability over short-term gains.
Why Product Discipline Separates Successful Programs From Disappointing Ones
In my experience, the most successful dealer reinsurance programs share one trait: discipline.
They do not chase volume at the expense of performance. They understand that reinsurance is a long-term asset, not a monthly income supplement. Product selection is treated as a strategic decision, not an afterthought.
Dealers who approach reinsurance with this mindset consistently see stronger underwriting results, clearer reporting, and greater confidence in their program.
Aligning Product Strategy With Long-Term Dealer Goals
Reinsurance should support broader dealership objectives, including:
Stable profitability
Improved enterprise value
Better customer outcomes
Product strategy plays a critical role in achieving those goals. When products are selected intentionally and managed actively, reinsurance becomes a tool for long-term value creation rather than frustration.
Moving Forward With the Right Partner and Perspective
Choosing which products belong in a dealer reinsurance program is not a one-time decision. It is an ongoing process that requires transparency, data, and experience.
Dealers benefit most from working with partners who prioritize education and structure over sales volume. Firms like Elite FI Partners specialize in helping dealers evaluate product performance, compare reinsurance structures, and build disciplined portfolios supported by training and transparency. More information on their dealer wealth and reinsurance strategies can be found at https://www.elitefipartners.com/dealer-wealth-programs.
Reinsurance works best when product selection, structure, and execution are aligned. Dealers who understand what belongs in reinsurance—and what does not—are far more likely to see the long-term benefits the strategy is designed to deliver.
Frequently Asked Questions
What F&I products are best suited for dealer reinsurance?
Products with stable, predictable claims behavior are typically best suited for dealer reinsurance. Vehicle service contracts, limited warranties, and select appearance or protection products often perform well when pricing, administration, and training are disciplined.
Why does product selection matter so much in a dealer reinsurance program?
Product selection directly impacts loss ratios, reserve requirements, and long-term distributions. Stable products help create consistent underwriting results, while volatile products can stress reserves and suppress profitability over time.
Should every product that can be reinsured be included in the portfolio?
No. Just because a product can be reinsured does not mean it should be. A disciplined reinsurance portfolio is built intentionally around predictability, pricing adequacy, and claims consistency—not convenience or maximizing participation.
Are vehicle service contracts a good fit for dealer reinsurance?
In many cases, yes. Vehicle service contracts often have strong historical claims data, measurable trends, and predictable loss development when properly priced and administered, making them a common foundation for reinsurance portfolios.
What types of protection products can work well in reinsurance?
Some appearance and protection products can perform well when coverage terms are clearly defined and claim severity is limited. Each product should be evaluated individually based on historical performance and administrative consistency.
Why is GAP often considered risky to include in reinsurance?
GAP can be volatile because loss severity is influenced by external factors such as vehicle values, payoff conditions, economic shifts, and claim variability. This volatility can increase reserve pressure and reduce long-term predictability in a reinsurance portfolio.
How does product mix affect reserves and profit distributions?
Volatile products typically require higher reserves, which can delay profit recognition and distributions. A mixed portfolio without product-level tracking can also cause underperforming products to drag down overall program results.
Should dealer reinsurance reporting be broken down by product?
Ideally, yes. Product-level reporting helps dealers understand which products are performing well, which are underperforming, and where portfolio adjustments may improve long-term results. Blended reporting often hides meaningful trends.
How often should product selection be reviewed in a reinsurance program?
At minimum, product mix and performance should be reviewed quarterly, with a deeper annual review of loss trends, reserve adequacy, fees, and underwriting assumptions. Reinsurance improves when it is managed, not ignored.
Can a reinsurance portfolio be improved without changing the reinsurance structure?
Often, yes. Portfolio improvements can come from refining product selection, improving pricing discipline, strengthening training and process execution, and demanding better reporting transparency—assuming the underlying structure is not fundamentally misaligned.




Comments